Source: windowsondeathrow.com

Nico: In your opinion, should the death penalty for corruptors be carried out?

Berta: I doubt that choice because it will be a burden on state finances. They harm the state, let alone add to the financial burden.

Nico: Yes. You’ve got a point. But don't you think the death penalty gets in the way of similar cases in the future?

Berta: Right. However, it would be better if the corruptors were jailed for life so they don't return to the seat of government. Also, I think their families should be impoverished so that it becomes a lesson for others who will corrupt state money.

Nico: I see.

Statements:

1. The death penalty causes a financial burden.
2. Corruptors are those who steal state money.
3. The death penalty deters the same case in the future.
4. Corruptors should be impoverished.
5. Corruptors should return to the seat of government.
6. Impoverishment doesn’t affect the corruptors' family.

Among those statements, which is not/are not correct?